May 24, 2018
Past CBC awardee, Bozhi Tian, UChicago, speaks about his career and his newest research for the journal Nature
In a recent interview by Virginia Gewin for the journal Nature, Bozhi Tian, UChicago, describes his fascinating journey from doing energy research to becoming interested in electrophysiology and bioscience. Tian, a materials scientist, is known for developing nanoscale devices, or silicon-nanowires, which, when placed in a vicinity of neurons and become activated with light, can stimulate neuronal activity both in culture and in vivo, in animal models. Tian with his postdoctoral fellow, Yucai Wang, was also a co-recipient of a CBC Postdoctoral Research Award (2014), for a related project: “A Synthetic Biomineral Integrated with Silicon Nanowires.” CBC joins in congratulating Tian on being featured in the Nature article!
An ultralight way to manipulate brain signals
Materials scientist Bozhi Tian reveals the story behind a nanoscale device that stimulates neural activity when illuminated.
Nature, CAREER Q&A | by Virginia Gewin | May 23, 2018
Materials scientist Bozhi Tian developed silicon-nanowire solar cells in 2007. Now, at the University of Chicago in Illinois, he has shown how similar nanoscale devices can be used to manipulate brain signals with light.
Describe what your team’s latest study has achieved.
We’ve shown that we can stimulate behaviour in a mouse by placing a nanoscale silicon mesh on the part of the brain that translates nerve impulses into movement, and then shining a light onto the mesh (Y. Jiang et al. Nature Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0230-1; 2018). For example, we were able to control the animal’s left forelimb by flashing a beam at the right side of its brain.
Why is this approach game-changing?
Until now, there have been only two main methods of neurostimulation. The first involves implanting electrodes to produce neural activity. The second, called optogenetics, requires cells to be genetically modified so that they can be controlled using light, but genetic modification is difficult and carries ethical concerns. Our approach uses a non-genetic neurostimulation device that enables distant nerves to be stimulated with light. It could have a big impact on the treatment of pain and other disorders.
Has it led your research in a new direction?
Yes, we now plan to do research on non-human primates — for example, exploring how to restore grasping functions after paralysis.
Does the device have potential clinical applications?
If we put the silicon mesh on the brain surface, we can elicit some activity deep inside the brain. And if you can stimulate the brain, you can treat certain neurological diseases or help a person to regain control over parts of their body. So it could be used to treat diseases such as Parkinson’s or disorders such as depression.
Describe one of your breakthrough moments.
My graduate student Ramya Parameswaran has demonstrated how a silicon nanowire can stimulate single cells (R. Parameswaran et al. Nature Nanotech 13, 260–266; 2018). Some of the gold that catalyses growth of the silicon wire becomes individual atoms that cover the wire’s surface. When we removed the atomic gold, some neurons couldn’t be activated. We later found that the gold enhanced the silicon’s electrochemical properties and made it a better neurostimulator.
You switched your research focus from energy to neurostimulation. What happened?
I left China to start a PhD at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2004, working on the use of single nanowires in photovoltaics. We showed that silicon nanowires can convert sunlight into electricity, just as conventional solar cells do. However, they are also small enough to be integrated into nanodevices. After that work was published (B. Tian et al. Nature 449, 885–889; 2007), I decided to completely change my research interest from energy to electrophysiology and bioscience.
Why did you make that change?
Biology offered lots of opportunity and room for exploration, especially in bringing nanowires and neuroscience together. And I like to explore the unknown. So, for the second half of my PhD, I worked on developing a transistor that’s small enough to be delivered into a single cell to record electrical activities.
How was the transition?
It was tough. I had no experience in cell culture, electrophysiology or working with animal tissues. I took a neuroscience course and learnt tremendously from that. Even so, there were setbacks. For example, my cell cultures kept getting contaminated. But I told myself that good moments would come if I persisted.
How did you find collaborators?
When I began at Chicago, some biologists were interested in collaborating; others weren’t. I gave a lecture to biophysics students, and Ana Correa, a biochemist and the wife of molecular biologist Francisco Bezanilla, attended. She introduced me to her husband afterwards, and he and I have since written grants and papers together. Sometimes you just need that right moment and right person.
Nature 557, 601 (2018). doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05216-8. This interview has been edited for clarity and length.
Adapted (with modifications) from the Nature, Career Q&A, by Virginia Gewin, published on May 23, 2018.